![]() ![]() ![]() (and even still, if your total CPU cache isn't 10MB, it likely isn't that much smaller). > If you were referring strictly to CPU cache, then I'm even more confused, because the entire existence of that stuff is predicated on it being faster than memory, so. If you think the JVM is smaller, how small is it exactly? The parent was suggesting that this was all that was actually needed out of the 100mb or so downloadable. and it still needs to leverage a general purpose runtime/JIT that is orders of magnitude larger to do its single fixed purpose. I'm not sure why you'd say it is too big. By your same assertion, I could say that one of my CPU registers is only 64-bits wide, so I imagine all programs larger than 64-bits can't run faster than 元 cache. * It's not like the whole package would sit in RAM the whole time anyway. * If you were referring strictly to CPU cache, then I'm even more confused, because the entire existence of that stuff is predicated on it being faster than memory, so. ![]() These days, most magnetic disks have more cache than that, and if you are using SSD's, there's a boatload more cache than that in there. * I don't know your hardware, but there is very, very good chance you are actually quite wrong about <10MB of cache. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |